-->

Related Post

6 Comments Received

November 17th, 2007 @3:00 pm  

I agree with you. BURY THOSE STORIES DOWN!

elmimo
November 19th, 2007 @3:46 am  

Well I just think that digg should support other languages, it would prevent stories from different languages to be mixed together.

Debo
November 19th, 2007 @8:43 pm  

I personally think we should just bury them down, and get them off the page.

However, I’m not sure if the bury button brings any bad karma to your account. Because of that reason alone, I personally would just ignore them. It’s not worth it…. especially since they aren’t going to make it to the FP anyways.

just a thought.

November 20th, 2007 @1:56 am  

I don’t use digg that often, but I feel that because it’s an english-only site, that there shouldn’t be any other languages. It even says so in the Digg FAQ’s.

If digg isn’t going to properly clean off the “foreign spam” then the users should.

Bottom Line.

December 16th, 2007 @6:54 pm  

I am new to Digg and have not read the Digg FAQs as of yet. My response to Diggs in foreign languages is this, if Digg isn’t going to support the foreign languages so that we can translate them in order to respond accordingly, we as diggers are potentially missing out on some great conversation. So, don’t bury them, tell Digg that we want translators available to us so we can respond or bury with a clear conscious.

CEP
June 10th, 2008 @12:16 am  

I don’t use digg very often, but I feel that because it’s an english-only site, then there should not be any other languages. It even says so in the Digg FAQ’s. But, you’ll really never be able to stop people who post digg stories in foreign languages. It’s kinda like, how you’ll never stop the digg spammers, or the wanna-be SEO’s who just submits stuff to digg, in order to be ranked faster in the Google Index.

It’s just the way it is.

Leave A Reply

Please Note: Comments maybe under moderation after you submit your comments so there is no need to resubmit your comment again